docs: add CONTRIBUTING.md and SECURITY.md for open source
All checks were successful
CI/CD Pipeline / Code Format (push) Successful in 4s
CI/CD Pipeline / Clippy Lints (push) Successful in 43s
CI/CD Pipeline / All Unit Tests (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI/CD Pipeline / Security Audit (push) Successful in 4s
CI/CD Pipeline / Enrollment Tests (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI/CD Pipeline / Verify Enrollment CLI Flag (push) Successful in 1m8s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Debian Package (Ubuntu 22.04) (push) Successful in 2m26s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build RPM Package (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Arch Package (push) Successful in 2m37s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Debian Package (push) Successful in 2m15s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Alpine Package (push) Successful in 3m31s
All checks were successful
CI/CD Pipeline / Code Format (push) Successful in 4s
CI/CD Pipeline / Clippy Lints (push) Successful in 43s
CI/CD Pipeline / All Unit Tests (push) Successful in 1m12s
CI/CD Pipeline / Security Audit (push) Successful in 4s
CI/CD Pipeline / Enrollment Tests (push) Successful in 1m14s
CI/CD Pipeline / Verify Enrollment CLI Flag (push) Successful in 1m8s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Debian Package (Ubuntu 22.04) (push) Successful in 2m26s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build RPM Package (push) Successful in 2m33s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Arch Package (push) Successful in 2m37s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Debian Package (push) Successful in 2m15s
CI/CD Pipeline / Build Alpine Package (push) Successful in 3m31s
This commit is contained in:
79
CONTRIBUTING.md
Normal file
79
CONTRIBUTING.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
|
||||
# Contributing to Linux-Patch-Api
|
||||
|
||||
Thank you for your interest in contributing to Linux-Patch-Api! We appreciate every contribution — from bug reports and documentation improvements to new features and security fixes.
|
||||
|
||||
## Code of Conduct
|
||||
|
||||
This project follows the [Contributor Covenant v2.1](https://www.contributor-covenant.org/version/2/1/code_of_conduct/) code of conduct. By participating, you are expected to uphold this standard. Please report unacceptable behavior to the maintainers.
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Contribute
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Fork** the repository
|
||||
2. Create a **feature branch** from `main`:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
git checkout -b feat/my-feature
|
||||
```
|
||||
3. Make your changes
|
||||
4. Ensure all CI checks pass:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cargo fmt --check
|
||||
cargo clippy -- -D warnings
|
||||
cargo test
|
||||
```
|
||||
5. **Commit** using conventional commit format (see below)
|
||||
6. Open a **Pull Request** against `main`
|
||||
|
||||
## Development Setup
|
||||
|
||||
### Prerequisites
|
||||
|
||||
- **Rust toolchain** (stable) — [rustup](https://rustup.rs/)
|
||||
- **System dependencies**:
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
sudo apt-get install build-essential libsystemd-dev pkg-config libssl-dev
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Build & Run
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cargo build
|
||||
cargo test
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Commit Messages
|
||||
|
||||
We use [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/):
|
||||
|
||||
| Prefix | Usage |
|
||||
|----------|------------------------|
|
||||
| `feat:` | New feature |
|
||||
| `fix:` | Bug fix |
|
||||
| `docs:` | Documentation changes |
|
||||
| `chore:` | Maintenance tasks |
|
||||
| `refactor:` | Code refactoring |
|
||||
| `test:` | Adding or updating tests |
|
||||
| `ci:` | CI configuration changes |
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
```
|
||||
feat: add endpoint for patch rollback
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Pull Request Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- All CI checks must pass (fmt, clippy, test, audit, build)
|
||||
- One feature or fix per PR — keep changes focused
|
||||
- Include a clear description of what changed and why
|
||||
- Update documentation if your change affects behavior
|
||||
|
||||
## Reporting Issues
|
||||
|
||||
Use [GitHub Issues](https://github.com/Draco-Lunaris/Linux-Patch-Api/issues) to report bugs, request features, or ask questions. Please include:
|
||||
|
||||
- Steps to reproduce (for bugs)
|
||||
- Expected vs. actual behavior
|
||||
- Relevant logs or error messages
|
||||
|
||||
## License
|
||||
|
||||
By contributing, you agree that your contributions are licensed under the [Apache License 2.0](LICENSE), the same license as this project.
|
||||
356
SECURITY.md
356
SECURITY.md
@ -1,346 +1,46 @@
|
||||
# Linux_Patch_API - Security Specification Document
|
||||
# Security Policy
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Overview
|
||||
## Supported Versions
|
||||
|
||||
**Philosophy:** Defense in depth with zero-trust principles for internal network.
|
||||
Only the **latest release** is currently supported with security updates.
|
||||
|
||||
**Approach:**
|
||||
- mTLS certificate-based authentication (required for all connections)
|
||||
- IP whitelist enforcement (deny by default, allow only listed)
|
||||
- Comprehensive audit logging for all operations
|
||||
- Systemd hardening and process isolation
|
||||
- Minimal attack surface (internal network only)
|
||||
| Version | Supported |
|
||||
|---------|----------|
|
||||
| Latest | ✅ |
|
||||
| Older | ❌ |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
## Reporting a Vulnerability
|
||||
|
||||
## Threat Model
|
||||
**Do not report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub Issues.**
|
||||
|
||||
### Threat Actor Profile
|
||||
Instead, use GitHub's private vulnerability reporting:
|
||||
|
||||
| Attribute | Description |
|
||||
|-----------|-------------|
|
||||
| **Origin** | Internal network only |
|
||||
| **Skill Level** | Moderate to High |
|
||||
| **Resources** | Limited (not nation-state) |
|
||||
| **Motivation** | Unauthorized system access, privilege escalation |
|
||||
| **Access** | Must bypass mTLS + IP whitelist |
|
||||
👉 [Report a vulnerability for Linux-Patch-Api](https://github.com/Draco-Lunaris/Linux-Patch-Api/security/advisories/new)
|
||||
|
||||
### STRIDE Threat Analysis
|
||||
This allows us to coordinate a fix before public disclosure.
|
||||
|
||||
| Threat Category | Potential Threat | Mitigation | Status |
|
||||
|-----------------|------------------|------------|--------|
|
||||
| **Spoofing** | Attacker impersonates valid client | mTLS certificate validation, unique certs per client | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Spoofing** | Attacker uses expired/revoked cert | Certificate expiry validation (1-year max) | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Tampering** | API requests modified in transit | TLS 1.3 encryption | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Tampering** | Config files modified unauthorized | File permissions (600/644), config validation before reload | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Repudiation** | Client denies making request | Audit logging with request_id, client cert ID | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Repudiation** | Server denies response | Comprehensive audit trail (systemd journal) | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Information Disclosure** | Package/data info leaked to unauthorized | Silent drop for non-mTLS, IP whitelist | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Information Disclosure** | Error messages leak system info | Detailed errors only for authenticated clients | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Denial of Service** | Resource exhaustion via many requests | Internal network only, IP whitelist limits exposure | ⚠️ Partial |
|
||||
| **Denial of Service** | Job queue flooding | Configurable concurrent job limit (default: 5) | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Denial of Service** | Long-running job starvation | 30-minute job timeout enforcement | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Elevation of Privilege** | Unauthorized package installation | Root required, but mTLS + IP whitelist required | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
| **Elevation of Privilege** | Subprocess escape | SystemCallFilter, ProtectSystem=strict | ✅ Mitigated |
|
||||
### Response Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
### Attack Vectors & Mitigations
|
||||
- **Acknowledgment** within 48 hours
|
||||
- **Initial assessment** within 7 days
|
||||
- **Ongoing updates** on remediation progress
|
||||
|
||||
| Attack Vector | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
|
||||
|---------------|------------|--------|------------|
|
||||
| Network interception | Low | Critical | TLS 1.3 only, mTLS required |
|
||||
| Certificate theft | Medium | Critical | Cert permissions (600), internal CA only |
|
||||
| IP spoofing | Low | High | IP whitelist + mTLS (both required) |
|
||||
| Config file tampering | Medium | High | File permissions, validation before reload |
|
||||
| Package manager injection | Low | Critical | Pluggable backend with input validation |
|
||||
| Job manipulation | Low | High | Job storage isolation, exclusive rollback mode |
|
||||
| Log tampering | Medium | High | systemd journal (immutable), optional remote syslog |
|
||||
## Disclosure Policy
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
We follow **coordinated disclosure**:
|
||||
|
||||
## Authentication & Authorization
|
||||
- We ask for **90 days** before public disclosure of a vulnerability
|
||||
- Security advisories are published via [GitHub Security Advisories](https://github.com/Draco-Lunaris/Linux-Patch-Api/security/advisories)
|
||||
- We will work with you to determine an appropriate disclosure timeline when a fix requires more time
|
||||
|
||||
### Authentication Requirements
|
||||
## Security Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
- **Method:** mTLS certificate-based authentication
|
||||
- **Certificate Type:** Unique client certificate per client (1-year validity)
|
||||
- **CA:** Internal self-hosted Certificate Authority
|
||||
- **TLS Version:** TLS 1.3 only
|
||||
- **Multi-factor:** Certificate + IP whitelist (dual requirement)
|
||||
- **Session Management:** Stateless (no sessions)
|
||||
This project is a security tool — we hold ourselves to a high standard:
|
||||
|
||||
### Authorization Model
|
||||
- **Signed commits**: All commits must be signed (SSH signing)
|
||||
- **CI enforcement**: All PRs require passing CI checks (fmt, clippy, test, audit, build)
|
||||
- **Dependency auditing**: `cargo audit` runs in CI to catch known vulnerabilities
|
||||
|
||||
- **Model:** Binary authorization (all-or-nothing)
|
||||
- **Permission Levels:** Single level (full access if authenticated)
|
||||
- **Requirements:**
|
||||
- Valid mTLS certificate (not expired, signed by internal CA)
|
||||
- Source IP in whitelist (YAML config, instant apply)
|
||||
- **No RBAC:** All authenticated clients have full API access
|
||||
## Credit
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Data Security
|
||||
|
||||
### Encryption at Rest
|
||||
|
||||
- **Certificates:** File permissions 600 for private keys
|
||||
- **Job Storage:** `/var/lib/linux_patch_api/jobs/` (cleared on restart)
|
||||
- **Config Files:** `/etc/linux_patch_api/` (644 for config, 600 for keys)
|
||||
- **Audit Logs:** systemd journal (immutable by default)
|
||||
|
||||
### Encryption in Transit
|
||||
|
||||
- **Protocol:** TLS 1.3 only
|
||||
- **Port:** 12443
|
||||
- **Cipher Suites:** TLS 1.3 default (no legacy cipher support)
|
||||
- **Certificate Validation:** Mutual TLS (server + client cert required)
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Management
|
||||
|
||||
- **CA Private Key:** Stored securely on CA host only
|
||||
- **Server Certificates:** `/etc/linux_patch_api/certs/server.key` (600)
|
||||
- **Client Certificates:** Distributed manually to authorized clients
|
||||
- **Rotation:** 1-year certificate expiry, manual renewal process
|
||||
- **Revocation:** Not implemented (rely on expiry + physical cert retrieval)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## API Security
|
||||
|
||||
### Input Validation
|
||||
|
||||
- **Package Names:** Alphanumeric + standard package chars only
|
||||
- **Versions:** Semantic versioning validation
|
||||
- **IP Addresses:** IPv4 + CIDR validation for whitelist
|
||||
- **JSON Schema:** Strict schema validation for all request bodies
|
||||
- **Path Traversal:** Blocked (no `..` in paths)
|
||||
|
||||
### Rate Limiting
|
||||
|
||||
- **Not Required:** Internal network only with strict IP whitelist
|
||||
- **Job Concurrency:** Configurable limit (default: 5 concurrent jobs)
|
||||
- **Job Timeout:** 30-minute maximum per job
|
||||
|
||||
### CORS Policy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Not Applicable:** API is not browser-accessible
|
||||
- **Origin:** mTLS clients only (no browser CORS concerns)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Audit & Logging
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Events to Log
|
||||
|
||||
- All API requests (endpoint, method, timestamp, client cert ID, source IP)
|
||||
- Authentication events (success/failure, cert validation result)
|
||||
- Authorization events (IP whitelist match/failure)
|
||||
- Package operations (package name, version, action, result)
|
||||
- Configuration changes (config reload, whitelist updates)
|
||||
- Job lifecycle events (create, start, complete, fail, timeout, rollback)
|
||||
- Service events (start, stop, restart, config validation failures)
|
||||
|
||||
### Log Protection
|
||||
|
||||
- **Primary Storage:** systemd journal (immutable, access-controlled)
|
||||
- **Secondary Storage:** Optional remote syslog
|
||||
- **Fallback:** Local file `/var/log/linux_patch_api/audit.log` (640)
|
||||
- **Retention:** 30 days with daily rotation and compression
|
||||
- **Access:** Root only, audit group read access
|
||||
- **Integrity:** systemd journal provides tamper evidence
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Compliance Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- **Internal Standards:** Follows organizational security policies
|
||||
- **No External Compliance:** Not designed for PCI-DSS, HIPAA, SOC2 (can be extended)
|
||||
- **Audit Trail:** Comprehensive logging supports internal audit requirements
|
||||
- **Access Control:** mTLS + IP whitelist provides strong access control
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Security Testing
|
||||
|
||||
### Penetration Testing
|
||||
|
||||
- **Schedule:** Required before production deployment
|
||||
- **Scope:**
|
||||
- mTLS authentication bypass attempts
|
||||
- IP whitelist enforcement testing
|
||||
- API endpoint fuzzing
|
||||
- Certificate validation testing
|
||||
- Config file tampering attempts
|
||||
- Privilege escalation attempts
|
||||
- **Tester:** Internal security team or external contractor
|
||||
- **Frequency:** Annual or after major changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Vulnerability Management
|
||||
|
||||
- **Dependency Scanning:** Rust crate security advisories monitored
|
||||
- **System Patches:** Host system patched via API itself (dogfooding)
|
||||
- **Certificate Updates:** Annual renewal process
|
||||
- **Config Audits:** Quarterly review of whitelist and security settings
|
||||
- **Incident Response:** Log analysis for security event investigation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3 Security Testing Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Date:** 2026-04-09
|
||||
**Tester:** Agent Zero Fuzz Testing Agent
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ ALL CRITICAL ISSUES RESOLVED - Minor improvements recommended
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Test Summary (16 Tests)
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Passed | Failed | Status |
|
||||
|----------|--------|--------|--------|
|
||||
| mTLS Enforcement | 3 | 0 | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| IP Whitelist | 1 | 0 | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| API Endpoints | 5 | 0 | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Input Validation | 3 | 0 | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Certificate Security | 2 | 0 | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Configuration Security | 2 | 0 | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| **TOTAL** | **16** | **0** | **✅ 100%** |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3 Fuzz Testing Results
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Date:** 2026-04-09
|
||||
**Tester:** Agent Zero Fuzz Testing Agent
|
||||
**Test Type:** Comprehensive Fuzz Testing
|
||||
**Overall Status:** ⚠️ GOOD - Minor improvements needed
|
||||
|
||||
### Fuzz Test Summary (21 Tests)
|
||||
|
||||
| Section | Tests | Passed | Failed | Pass Rate |
|
||||
|---------|-------|--------|--------|-----------|
|
||||
| API Input Fuzzing | 8 | 5 | 3 | 62.5% |
|
||||
| Request Header Fuzzing | 5 | 2 | 3 | 40% |
|
||||
| Certificate Fuzzing | 5 | 5 | 0 | 100% |
|
||||
| Rate Limiting/DoS | 3 | 3 | 0 | 100% |
|
||||
| **TOTAL** | **21** | **15** | **6** | **71.4%** |
|
||||
|
||||
### Vulnerabilities Identified
|
||||
|
||||
| ID | Severity | Category | Description | Status |
|
||||
|----|----------|----------|-------------|--------|
|
||||
| VULN-001 | MEDIUM | Input Validation | Missing input length validation | 📝 Recommended |
|
||||
| VULN-002 | MEDIUM | Input Validation | Path traversal partial bypass | 📝 Recommended |
|
||||
| VULN-003 | LOW | Input Validation | Empty string validation missing | 📝 Recommended |
|
||||
| VULN-004 | MEDIUM | Header Security | Missing header size limits | 📝 Recommended |
|
||||
| VULN-005 | LOW | HTTP Protocol | Invalid methods return 404 vs 405 | 📝 Recommended |
|
||||
| VULN-006 | LOW | Header Security | Duplicate header handling | 📝 Recommended |
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Strengths Confirmed
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **mTLS Implementation: ROBUST**
|
||||
- All invalid certificates properly rejected at TLS layer
|
||||
- Silent drop behavior prevents information leakage
|
||||
- Certificate chain validation working correctly
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Injection Protection: EFFECTIVE**
|
||||
- SQL injection patterns: 4/4 blocked
|
||||
- Command injection patterns: 5/5 handled safely
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **DoS Protection: ADEQUATE**
|
||||
- Large payloads (10MB) properly rejected with HTTP 413
|
||||
- Concurrent connections (20) handled gracefully
|
||||
- Rapid flooding (100 req) completed without service degradation
|
||||
|
||||
### Recommendations for Phase 4
|
||||
|
||||
**Medium Priority:**
|
||||
1. Implement input length validation (package names: 256 chars max)
|
||||
2. Enhance path traversal protection with strict normalization
|
||||
3. Configure header size limits (8KB max)
|
||||
|
||||
**Low Priority:**
|
||||
4. Return 405 Method Not Allowed for unsupported methods
|
||||
5. Reject empty strings for required fields
|
||||
6. Handle duplicate headers with rejection
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Overall Security Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Status | Notes |
|
||||
|----------|--------|-------|
|
||||
| Authentication (mTLS) | ✅ SECURE | All certificate attacks blocked |
|
||||
| Authorization (IP Whitelist) | ✅ SECURE | Properly enforced |
|
||||
| Input Validation | ⚠️ GOOD | Minor improvements recommended |
|
||||
| Injection Protection | ✅ SECURE | SQL/Command/Path traversal blocked |
|
||||
| DoS Protection | ✅ SECURE | Large payloads rejected |
|
||||
| Certificate Security | ✅ SECURE | Robust mTLS implementation |
|
||||
|
||||
**Overall Security Posture: GOOD**
|
||||
|
||||
The API is suitable for internal network deployment. The 6 identified vulnerabilities are low-to-medium severity and represent hardening opportunities rather than critical security gaps. All critical and high severity issues from earlier testing have been resolved.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3 Threat Model Validation
|
||||
|
||||
**Validation Date:** 2026-04-09
|
||||
**Validator:** Threat Model Validation Agent (Agent Zero)
|
||||
**Report:** THREAT_MODEL_VALIDATION.md
|
||||
|
||||
### STRIDE Validation Summary
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Status | Confidence |
|
||||
|----------|--------|------------|
|
||||
| Spoofing | ✅ Fully Mitigated | High |
|
||||
| Tampering | ⚠️ Partially Mitigated | Medium |
|
||||
| Repudiation | ✅ Fully Mitigated | High |
|
||||
| Information Disclosure | ✅ Fully Mitigated | High |
|
||||
| Denial of Service | ⚠️ Partially Mitigated | Medium |
|
||||
| Elevation of Privilege | ✅ Fully Mitigated | High |
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Findings
|
||||
|
||||
**Validated Strengths:**
|
||||
- mTLS authentication robust (all certificate attacks blocked)
|
||||
- TLS 1.3 enforcement verified (plain HTTP rejected)
|
||||
- IP whitelist enforcement working correctly
|
||||
- Audit logging provides strong non-repudiation
|
||||
- Job-level DoS protection implemented
|
||||
- Injection protection effective (SQL, command, path traversal)
|
||||
- Systemd hardening in place
|
||||
|
||||
**Identified Gaps (Medium Priority):**
|
||||
- Rate limiting not implemented (relies on network security)
|
||||
- Header size limits not configured
|
||||
- Input length validation missing
|
||||
- Config file integrity relies on permissions only
|
||||
- No certificate revocation mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:** Proceed to Phase 4 with focus on medium-priority hardening items. API suitable for internal network deployment with current mitigations.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
- Fuzz test script: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/fuzz_tests.sh`
|
||||
- Security test script: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/security_tests.sh`
|
||||
- Fuzz test report: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/FUZZ_TEST_REPORT.md`
|
||||
- Security findings report: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/SECURITY_FINDINGS_REPORT.md`
|
||||
- Threat model validation: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/THREAT_MODEL_VALIDATION.md`
|
||||
- API specification: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/API_SPEC.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Security documentation updated following Phase 3 Security Hardening and Threat Model Validation - Agent Zero*
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
- Fuzz test script: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/fuzz_tests.sh`
|
||||
- Security test script: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/security_tests.sh`
|
||||
- Fuzz test report: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/FUZZ_TEST_REPORT.md`
|
||||
- API specification: `/a0/usr/projects/linux_patch_api/API_SPEC.md`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
*Security documentation updated following Phase 3 Security Hardening - Agent Zero Fuzz Testing Agent*
|
||||
Contributors who responsibly report vulnerabilities will be credited in the corresponding GitHub Security Advisory.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user